Analytics & Product StatusBird PositionBird Sensa Wellness Investing Contact
Back to Investing

I Called for $150K Bitcoin in January. It Is $64K. I Still Stand by the Call.

The S&P 500 closed Friday at a record after a negative jobs print. Bitcoin has missed the entire rally, sits a third below where it started the year, and just saw the worst quarter of ETF flows since the products launched. The path was wrong. The destination is not, and the setup for getting there just changed.

I Called for $150K Bitcoin in January. It Is $64K. I Still Stand by the Call.

Friday's July jobs report showed payrolls down 23,000 against expectations of 80,000, with wage growth at its slowest since 2021. The S&P 500 responded by closing at a record 7,757, up 3.6% for the week, because a weak labor market ends the September hike conversation. Odds of a 2026 hike fell to about 56%. Gold rose 8% for the week. Micron and Intel each gained 6% Friday, and Micron is up nicely from last Monday's levels.

Bitcoin did nothing. It is about $64,000 this morning, roughly a third below where it started the year and half its October 2025 high. It has missed the AI rally, the peace-deal rally, and the bad-news-is-good-news rally. In January I published a post calling for $150,000 in 2026. I still stand by that call. I also owe readers an honest accounting of why it has looked so wrong for seven months, because the reasons are exactly why the setup has changed.

What I Got Wrong: The Path, Not the Destination

My January thesis rested on three legs: a Fed easing cycle, continued ETF inflows, and Bitcoin trading as a liquidity asset rather than a risk asset. The first leg broke in February when the Iran conflict sent oil above $100 and turned the easing cycle into a hiking debate. The second broke with it: spot ETFs saw a record $4.5 billion of outflows in June alone and eight consecutive weeks of redemptions into early July. Strategy was reported to be weighing sales. The third leg held, and that is the point. Bitcoin did trade as a liquidity asset. Liquidity just went the wrong way.

What I got wrong was timing. I assumed the easing cycle would be continuous and it was interrupted by a war. What I did not get wrong is the destination: a liquidity asset with a fixed supply, a spot-ETF distribution channel that did not exist two cycles ago, and a Fed whose next durable move is still down. A shock that postpones the easing cycle postpones the target. It does not cancel it. So here is the update to the path.

Why the Liquidity Picture Just Turned

How to Approach It

Not all at once. The sensible structure is three tranches: a third at $64,000, a third if it revisits the June low near $58,000, and a third on a weekly close above $70,000, which would confirm the flows have turned. The level that would force me to retire the call is a weekly close below $55,000, because at that point the liquidity argument would be wrong in a way that timing cannot explain.

The target is unchanged: $150,000. What has changed is the timeline. In January that was a 2026 target. From $64,000 it requires a 134% move, and the last two times Bitcoin sat this far below its prior high with flows exhausted and the sell-side capitulating, in late 2022 and the middle of 2024, it more than doubled within twelve months of the low. I would rather be early and right about the destination than change the destination to match the mood. The exit should be sized on the way there, in stages, not promised in advance. That part I did learn the hard way.

Key Levels

First tranche$64,000 (now)
Second trancheNear $58,000, the June low
Third tranche, breakout confirmationWeekly close above $70,000
Target, unchanged from January$150,000
Level that would retire the callWeekly close below $55,000
Macro trigger I am watchingJuly CPI Wednesday under 3.5% keeps the hike off the table

My Take

My January call was a liquidity call, and a war sent liquidity the other way for seven months. That is a delay, not a refutation. The evidence that liquidity is turning back, a negative jobs print, exhausted ETF outflows, sell-side capitulation, and gold moving first, is the strongest it has been all year, and the asset that lagged the most on the way down is the one with the most to recover.

Playbook: the $150,000 call stands. Bitcoin in three tranches starting at $64,000, retired only on a weekly close below $55,000. Robinhood is the leveraged expression of the same call.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. All analysis is for informational and educational purposes only. Do your own research before making any investment decisions.